Newt Gingrich Says Trump Is Actually GOOD For The Republican Party!

The Nootster always tries to make observations that others are missing out on, and this analysis of how Donald Trump might actually be helping the Republican Party is no exception.

Watch below:

The Newt points out that Trump is bringing in a lot of non-traditional voters and others who wouldn’t normally care about politics.

And that will help Republicans expand their base and bring in new voters that they’re going to need to win the election.

Newt points out that Trump is forcing a reversal of roles between our government rulers and the we, the people:

“The point is for the Washington elites to understand the American people, not for the people to understand the Washington elites.”

And that is good for the country regardless of what who the candidate is.

 
  • CCblogging

    Trump be da man! Trump 2016

    • Terry Hoagland

      Sho nuff is!!!!

  • kim segar

    Newt is a phoney, I stay updated on all gov crap that so many forget..who needs his voice…Go TRUMP…

    • wearyconservative1946

      If you think Newt is a phony, you’re obviously not as informed as you seem to think.

      • Robert

        VOTE TRUMP 2016 For real change and Strong Leadership.

        • wearyconservative1946

          I can’t disagree with that, but it doesn’t make Newt Gingrich a phony.

          • Robert

            I never said he was.

          • wearyconservative1946

            No, you didn’t, but you responded to a post I addressed as a reply to someone else and I felt I needed to clarify what I said in my original post.

          • Terry Hoagland

            Newt Gingrich was one of the most conservative speakers we’ve had!!!!!

          • Arizona Don

            Correct. He also keeps his word. Not like the guys who become speaker today.

          • Robert

            ok

        • tbs

          Newt has to stay neutral, at this point.

    • Arizona Don

      Newt is a good man.

    • dfinch

      There’s nothing phony about him. He’s one of the smartest that’s come out of DC. I know him and Clinton got a lot of done during his time and it was bipartisan. Newt brought his downfall on himself.

  • Ddenney1

    Not a Trump guy but he is good for the party IF they FINALLY pay attention to the BASE!! It would be good for the republicans to REMEMBER what happened to the WHIG party when the GOP started!!!

    • maxx

      The political parties are so powerful, so corrupt and so far out of touch with the citizenry that they will not change in any way until we the people change it for them. Politicians are supposed to be “our representatives in the government”. Are they? Rhetorical question! For decades they have ignored us except before each election. Then it’s back to the status quo. They like things just as they are with them ruling and us working to pay the bills they make. The democrats made a huge change back in the 1960’s when the adopted the socialist/communist agenda. The republicans joined them in the 1970’s and have continued to lie to the people ever since. Time to hold them accountable, they won’t do it on their own,

      • CommonSense4America

        One way or another,,,as per the Constitution.

      • Watchmanonwall

        Yes, The gop treats Constitutional Conservatives the same way demonrats treat blacks. Only pander to us to get our vote, then do the opposite the rest of the time. Cruz Stood alone and called McConnell a liar when McConnell lied to our faces. Now th’rump says he can work with demoncraps. That is not what I am looking for. I want someone to DEFEAT demonrats. REPEAL obaMao-dont-care. Turn over the money changers tables.

        • maxx

          I’m with you all the way. And there are millions just like us this time around. The liberal press is trying to sell the story that a majority of Trump supporters are all talk and will not show up at the polls. I believe that is what they are hoping but I think as Pat Buchanan just said “this is going to be an election of angry people that have had enough”. I could not agree more since the people on the top right now are the outsiders and people the GOP hates.

  • Marie Hoffman

    Trump is good for America, period! After the Obama disasters these eight years, we need a real leader, a real American and that is Trump!

    • tCotUS

      I still believe OBOZO was a plant…I spent days looking up the History of OBOZO..Try it sometime, & see how far you get….People he supposedly went to Columbia University never heard of him during that period. ,He was supposedly an attorney up until 2002, NO Bar Exam
      records? If it smells like a RAT, looks like a rat, it must be a DemORAT. Time for an exterminator.

      • Henry L

        I have always believed that he is a cog in a big international conspiracy machine. When I saw him coming in a black limousine tank making his victory tour he made me think of a banana republic potentate.

    • m1a0n3u0e1l2

      He is good for the depraved, perverted, liar, dishonest, indecent, low-class, uneducated and the ones who, not being that way, use them for his or her own benefits.

  • Richard Bagenstose

    trump isn’t bring more people into the gop base, trump is bringing people into the trump base, the gop loke the dems don’t stand for anything but them selves these days, and americans are tired of it,, i would not be surprised if the gop lost the house and senate big in 2016 and trump wins the white house, we have a bunch of useless idiots in congress and trump won’t put up with there bull shit, the best way to fix congress is to have trump give them bills and when they refuse to vote on them , you go public and let the people hammer these congressmen

    • Robert

      That’s what Reagan had to do.

    • Terry Hoagland

      For some reason those Rinos don’t want Trump to win!!!! Could it be if he wins he will open up several cans of worms and do away with their stealing?

      • What will the poor lobbyists do, how will our poor congressmen get free stuff??

      • Richard Bagenstose

        well trump is bringing all the things americans want fix to the surface , and congress does not want that to happen , because they are in on the treasonist plan of obomas, for 7 years the illegals have bin flowing across the border unstopped , and they won’t even talk about it

      • tbs

        Absolutely! They will also lose a lot of big pocket obey from lobbyist!

      • marlene

        YES – he’s already exposed them to us. No member of congress should be elected to the Oval Office.

    • marlene

      TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT 2016

  • maxx

    When looking over the list of candidates for the Republican party there is not a single one that first of all is not loyal to the party first, big government second, their donors third and their own necks fourth; except for Donald Trump. This puts “we the people” far enough down the priority list to be of little concern to them at all. And the GOP has proven this time and time again. The latest betrayal by Paul (Rino) Ryan should be the last time an establishment politician is ever trusted for anything again. Politicians don’t live in the same world we do. They are so out of touch with what most Americans think and want it is impossible for anything to be changed for the better by them. So when we have both corrupt parties plus the MSM against one man in particular you know very well it has nothing to do with changing the direction America is being led by the ruling class. This is the time for American citizens to chose their own president and not have the parties and MSM do it for us. The anger toward our corrupt, rogue politicians has never been higher. Use that anger and frustration at the ballot boxes. You are the only people that can fix the problems government has created.

    • Arizona Don

      I think you missed Cruz. but I like Trump for president as well. I also think Paul does not fall intro such a category. However, I cannot support him over Donald or Ted.

      • tbs

        Arizona Don, Cruz was not missed! Don’t forget he is a politician first! He would be better as a running mate VP with Trump as President. Trump will clean house, surround himself with very qualified people on what he does not know to make decisions…that is what good leaders do! Remember Obama would not listen to the advice (military wise) and got rid of the great Generals…but his agenda is to destroy America and take our money and freedom away – exactly what Hillary will do but worse! She is power hungry and does not care one iota, about the American people, but the money and title…she thinks she deserves it after being Sec Of State…just think of the money laundering she did as Sec of State and because of that the foreign country favors she owes.
        Trump owes NO-ONE!
        The GOP Establishment, politicians (liberals and Repubs), and media want Trump gone and are now trying to make sure Trump does not get the % amount of votes needed to win the nominee so they can name Jeb Bush as their nominee to pushTrump out! Dirty GOP Establishment as they are…how they insisted Trump sign a paper he would run as a Republiican and now cut his throat so Jeb wins! We need to unite and get behind Trump so he has enough votes OVER what he needs to be the nominee so GOP Establishment cannot put Jeb Bush up!

        • Arizona Don

          It seems like we are taking a chance on anyone right now who presents themselves as a member of either party. Politicians make promises and once elected forget them and go their merry way. The only time a politician really seems to pay attention to the citizens is when they are up for election or reelection. And they need your vote to remain in office and abuse their trust. However, I currently see little difference between the two parties when in power regarding truthfulness. I do believe Donald Trump has the ability to turn things around but it will not happen overnight. So anyone expecting an instant fix forget it. Obama has done way to much damage for that.

          Without a conservative however, I fear we face at least civil unrest if not civil war. There is little doubt in my mind it is not just obama who wishes to tear apart the United States of America. That it is collectively the goal of the total left. If that were not fact how could obama still have over 40% support. If the American people actually paid attention to what is happening around them this would not be the case. But they are not! So some push back is inevitable.

          Donald Trump is “not” the normal run of the mill politician (as a matter of fact he is NOT a politician in any matter of speaking) and therefore the Americans have more faith in him. Yes his success is as simple as that!

          In the final analysis it is either Donald Trump, someone like him or America will be at war with itself. Just way to many people will not accept being run over like obama is doing and hillary will continue to do.

  • bones1941

    Trump all the way 2016 !

  • Tricia Anthone

    Power CORRUPTS. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. This truism is the basis of a system of Governance PURPOSELY designed to frustrate the consolidation of power: Our Constitutional Republic is based on the DIVISION of power – not only among the branches of the Fed Government but between the Federal level and the STATES.
    We’ve allowed power to concentrate at the top. The solution ISN’T just replacing the person at the top but to BRING POWER HOME. We must RESTORE the Constitutional balance of power and restore the role of the States in national governance. (Some don’t even know the States are to HAVE a role in National Governance – without which, the Admin is free to consolidate power at the exec level as it has done.)
    Learn more about the movement to PULL POWER FROM WASHINGTON – now sweeping the nation: http://www.ConventionOfStates.com

    • wearyconservative1946

      Not only are states meant to have A role, states have almost FULL control Constitutionally, with only a scant few areas of power given over to the federal government.

      • marlene

        Which these same states that the CoS is enlisting have NOT done and cannot be expected to do through this trojan horse.

    • marlene

      NO CONVENTION OF STATES – PERIOD! It’s a vile trojan horse – period.

      • Tricia Anthone

        So you think the right to PROPOSE eligible amendments should be left to our esteemed experts in Congress, right? The Constitution PRESENTLY gives that power in equal measure to the States and to Congress, but you’re for DISABLING the states’ Constitutional exercise of it?

        • marlene

          You are wrong and you know it. We have never had an Article V convention because it’s too dangerous and the Delegates are not controlled or bound by State laws. The Federal Convention of 1787 was called to replace our first Constitution – the Articles of Confederation. And even though the convention was called to “revise” the Articles, the delegates wrote an entirely new constitution and we were fortunate that our Founders were not the anti-American crooks we have in office today. There is NO need for an Amendment as our sovereign Constitution gives the States full and complete power and authority to contain and nullify all acts of the federal government, which the states that joined your phony organization failed to do and, thus, have no intention of doing under the guise of a Convention of States. The left has been pushing for a convention for 50 years, when the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations wrote their own “Constitution for the New States of America,” which they, with the help of people like you, have been trying to impose ever since and which gives THEM the global corporate oligarchy control of American citizens, with the President of THEIR choosing having power over every other branch of government. No more checks and balances or separation of powers. The convention you and people like you propose would change the mode of ratification that will produce a totalitarian dictatorship wherein the States are dissolved and replaced with “regional” governments that answer only to the federal government, not to the people. Other examples, like the one above from the Rockefellers, is the “Constitution for the new Socialist Republice, from the Revolutionary Communist Party USA; the “The Marxist Constitution”, from George Soros, Eric Holder, Cass Sustein and its supporters from marxist college professors – with a deadline of 2020. A “rewritten” Constitution proposed by a CoS would legalize the powers the federal government has already usurped and give government control over our children – see UN Agenda and TPP, both of which have called for both, The CoS is lying through their teeth, and yours, when they tell “conservatives” they want to “limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government.” Under the planned North American Union, the US, Canada and New Mexico will “need” a new constitution to “fundamentally” change us from a sovereign nation to a member state of the North American Union controlled by the CFR and operated by the UN. We do NOT want to be changed from a Republic to a dictatorship and will fight against such proposals. READ the “Task Force Report” of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). See how the European Union is working out for Europe! WATCH “The Decline and Fall of the European Union.” Our existing Constitution is a 5,000 year old miracle because we delegated only a handful of enumerated powers the federal government. Our Constitution foes not need “fixing” – it needs to be restored and upheld. Our rights of free speech, freedom, liberty, and sovereignty need to be restored. READ “State of the Nullification Movement” 2015. So don’t send me any more comments – I will ignore them because I have just stated my position and refuse to argue with your unfounded and erroneous protestations.

          • Tricia Anthone

            You are arguing against a PRESENT provision of our Constitution, Marlene. If what you want is to AMEND the Constitution, ironically, you must follow the very article against which you presently argue! Otherwise, the States’ provision of Article V authority to CONVENE and PROPOSE stands. And the number of people realizing that the solution to our BROKEN Federal Gov’t is NOT forthcoming from the Federal level is growing hourly. The solution, many now realize, will have to come from the people – via the States. (As per the Framers’ design.)

          • marlene

            My argument stands. Don’t try your doublespeak on me. You are so WRONG it’s dangerous. This “conversation” is over. Have a nice flight.

          • Tricia Anthone

            I’m pretty certain that everyone reading this exchange is capable of reading for themselves Article V – one paragraph – and the supporting arguments for the provision of authority for both Congress and the States. On doing so, they’ll easily discern which of us is arguing for the invocation of our ACTUAL Constitution’s provisions for re-balancing power.

          • marlene

            Stop trolling me. I stated that the more desperate you become the more you would put your erroneous and invalid assumptions out there “to anyone who might be reading” this exchange between fact and fiction, the more fanatic you would become. Your constant barrage of ideological stupidity is exposed for what it is. Shame on you! You demean the intelligence of everyone who has read, knows, and understands our founding documents, and can see the outrageous mis-statements and lies about those documents. You are selling something that none of us can buy. Again, get off your podium of deception and stop steamrolling the people into something that would throw Americans into the hands of the totalitarian dictatorship that is presently our greatest threat. You become more delusional and evil with every comment you spew.

          • Fuzzynite21

            This women is not worth talking to as she is dumb as can be about how are government an states that our founders who wrote the constitution were God fearing christains an got tghere wisdom from the creater of heaven an earth.

          • marlene

            Yes, it is obvious, and sad, and dangerous to our Republic that so few of us understand enough to fight for it. Thank you for your comment.

          • Tricia Anthone

            To anyone who might be reading the exchange between Marlene and me: ONE of us in this exchange DOUBTS the legitimacy of our Constitution’s origin and FEARS its provisions. The other demonstrates fully informed faith in the legitimacy of our Constitution’s origins and its provisions for re-balancing power back to the people via the States.
            If you believe the person who claims our Constitution was illegally drafted and fears its provisions for rebalancing power, we get more of the same.
            If you believe the Constitution’s plain language, instead of Marlene’s frightful twist on it, learn more about how you can take part in the effort to restore Constitutional order via an Article V Convention:
            Visit: http://www.ConventionOfStates.com

          • marlene

            As I said, your comments expose your underhanded tactics and lies, as does the trojan horse, Convention of States. You have proved me right. You are desperate and to any intelligent patriot who would even bother to read your propaganda, but who has read my long comment, your are a blatant liar.

          • Tricia Anthone

            BTW: “…The Federal Convention of 1787 was called to replace our first Constitution – the Articles of Confederation. And even though the convention was called to “revise” the Articles, the delegates wrote an entirely new constitution …”
            ENTIRELY wrong. The Convention at ANNAPOLIS was called to revise the Articles of Confederation. On Convening, the states recognized that the current charge of their Convention was insufficient to the needs they were tasked with meeting. They therefore – properly – CLOSED their convention and sought (successfully) a new call – one “sufficient to the exigencies of the union.” It was THIS Convention – the Philadelphia Convention – properly called and charged with drafting a new Constitution – which then did so.
            ALL of this is a matter of record. Why you people persist in your attempt to sully the legitimate origins of our Constitution is beyond me. You keep this vile myth going only because many people had not the access to the Congressional record when it got started.
            The DEBUNK of this lie about our Constitutiona is now RIGHT AT YOUR FINGERTIPS. Look it up.

          • marlene

            Your contrariness does not negate what I said. It was originally called to revise it, but just like your Convention of States is trying to do, it REPLACED it entirely! Don’t even try to twist my facts into your lies. You are becoming more and more desperate to perpetuate the scam that is the Convention of States. I spelled all of this out in my long comment. Get a life and stop trying to take ours – we are patriets and constitutional scholars and you know less than the uninformed who would believe you.

          • Tricia Anthone

            Two separate Conventions, Marlene: Annapolis – called to revise the Articles of Confederation. on realizing that a Constitution was needed a separate call – one made for that purpose – was issued. The stated purpose of the Philadelphia Convention was to draft a Constitution. There was no “bait and switch” going on as you imply: “…even though the convention was called to “revise” the Articles, the delegates wrote an entirely new constitution and we were fortunate…”
            The historical record reflects the truth. When the Articles could not be revised in a manor sufficient to achieve the purpose, a Constitutional Convention was called and took place then in Philadelphia. No one was deceived into thinking otherwise. It was a lawful call, duly authorized to debate, draft and propose the Constitution, which was then ratified by the States.
            Today we seek a convention called UNDER and SUBJECT to our present Constitution. We seek that because only proposals coming from the States would strengthen, augment and clarify our Constitution’s existing constraints on Federal power. Any proposals made by the Convention would require passage by 3/4ths of the States’ legislatures (38). At least 75 separate legislative bodies (assuming Nebraska – a unicameral state legislature is among them.)
            Proposals might include meaningful limits on borrowing (who isn’t for that?) which might take the form of requiring approval from the States’ legislatures before increasing the debt limit. Today the “debt ceiling” fails to limit them at all. Other possibilities include a State countermand process for regs which seek to destroy industries as this administration has plainly done.
            Our present problems with Federal over-stepping, over-spending, over-borrowing must be addressed by the only political power equal to that of the US Federal Government. That power is the combined States. The way to avail ourselves of that power is to CONVENE the States. The more people learn, the more support this proposal gains.

          • marlene

            “…the delegates wrote an entirely new constitution and we were fortunate.” Eye, there’s the rub. And the danger that I’ve pointed out to anyone with the intelligence, and without the fanaticism of your cause, to see and understand. What you cover up is dangerous to our health. You are wrong beyond anything you use to support your un-American, subversive cult. As I pointed out, with the low character of the delegates today, we would NOT be so “fortunate.” Stop pushing your liberal drug of ignorance and give up the ghost. We will not let America lose its sovereignty over a few nutcases with their own untenable, stupid, and evil, agenda, who prowl this page like a cult that refuses to take no for an answer. Well guess what – NO! I would never leave the sovereignty of America in the hands of the likes of you or your cult.

          • Tricia Anthone

            Accusing someone of promulgating a cult because they disagree with you is absurd. The truth is that there is more content here that is NOT in dispute than content that is in dispute.
            The ARTICLE IS PRESENT in our Constitution. Not in dispute.
            The States may convene to offer ratification-eligible proposals. Not in dispute.
            It requires 3/4ths of the states (38) states to ratify any proposal made by the Convention. Not in dispute.
            In the founding era, the States convened more regularly than did Congress. There exists ample precedent as to the workings of States’ Conventions. That, too, is not in dispute.
            You may think it a bad idea for the States to exercise their Constitutional authority as prescribed by Article V but that doesn’t mean those who disagree with you are an evil cult.
            We support a course of action which is UNARGUABLY Constitutional.

          • marlene

            jAnd UNARGUABLY dangerous and unnecessary, in light of the two most troubling aspects of it: Those who would be delegates today are not the moral, intelligent men our Founders were; and, we do not trust the States do give over their duty, obligation, and authority to such a trojan horse CoS, after they have failed to use the remedies already delineated in our sovereign Constitution. You forget, or just don’t care, that our Republic depends on a moral people in order “…to keep it.” We’re losing it and there is nothing more advantageous for the advancement of a totalitarian dictatorship than for the people to hang themselves on the rope of a Convention of States. You misrepresent the real agenda of your cult by overlooking any and every valid claim against it. You have not, even once, returned a valid concern with a valid explanation. You rely solely on pulling out the same argument to support your position by citing different aspects of our constitution, without any due regard whatsoever, for the rest of the Constitution, which specifically list other remedies; nor have you backed up any of your assertions with anything from the Federalist Papers, the letters of our first Presidents and Founders, which is a clearly spells out their intent and warnings. You have completely disregarded their warnings, which threatens our Republic, rather than strengthens it. You have tried to turn this so-called discourse into an “exchange” (your own word) which exposes you for wanting to exchange our freedom for your destruction of it. No way, jose! Our mommas didn’t raise no fools. We’re patriots and do not respect you, your cult, or your agenda. We’ve had enough “Agenda” during these last 7 years, from the UN, the president, the treaties, and the global communists, and now your CoS. Give it up because the more you push it, the more we will fight against it. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

          • Tricia Anthone

            We’re done, Marlene. You accused the founders of exceeding the scope of their call in drafting the Constitution. You disagree with the balanced provision of authority granted by the Constitution and seek to vilify any who disagree with your fear-driven point of view with accusations of cultism and evil intent. Not the behavior of a rational person in my view.

          • marlene

            Goodbye and don’t come back. What you stand for, and against, should never be put into the heads of our youth, who with any help from we constitutionalists, should do a much better job of it than people like you. Your comments were loaded with the “fear” of desperation in not being able to “exchange” your poison for our freedom. “Rational” – lol! Rational is not a word i would use to describe you, your cult, or your agenda. In fact, it more closely resembles insane liberalism. Goodbye, now.

          • Tricia Anthone

            Ha! You who accuse the founders of illicitly exceeding the scope of their Convention and then installing a “Trojan horse” into our Constitution…You are a Constitutionalist? You claim to revere a group of men whose behavior would be reprehensible if your accusations were true. How do you carry such diametrically opposed thoughts in your head?

          • marlene

            Make a point with some substantiating facts. You can’t and you won’t. HA!

      • Tricia Anthone

        You oppose the current construct of Article V of the US Constitution? You know better than did the framers about how to balance the power provisioned in this Article? You oppose the States having a power equal to that exercised 27 times by Congress? Your preference is to nullify a Constitutional right of the States – without benefit of a deliberative process – but rather by fear mongering and calling a Constitutional provision of balanced power by threatening names.
        That’s not real bright, my friend. READ the Article itself. it’s only a paragraph. Then read the commentary offered by the Framers as to why it made sense to insure that the States also had the right to propose.
        Most importantly, use your head. Will Congress EVER propose to RESTRAIN it’s spending, borrowing or taxing power? Rather than pall-parroting those who are opposed to the Constitution’s provisions, read them and the reasoning that framed them for YOURSELF – use your own good head.

        • marlene

          You are terminally WRONG I’d suggest you use YOUR head, but obviously it isn’t on tight enough.

          • Tricia Anthone

            Sure Marlene – those who seek to invoke the Constitutional provisions of Article V are all wrong. Those of you who know BETTER than did the framers – who say CONGRESS alone should be trusted and the States cannot be trusted – only you are correct, right?

          • marlene

            Right. I get my information from our founding documents and the rules of law, not some Article V fanatic.

          • Tricia Anthone

            Only a “fanatic” would take the Constitution at its word, right, Marlene? The Article authorizes both Congress and the States to propose.
            PERHAPS because the nature of the proposals will differ: The Congress consistently proposes changes that empower the Congress and constrain the CIvil society. The States – were they to exercise – would propose amendments that CURTAIL the Congress and the Executive – perhaps even offer a solution to what has become Judicial supremacy (State countermand amendment).
            All of this sounds “dangerous” to those who prefer the central control and top-down authoritarianism which is emerging as a result of the states’ not fulfilling their role as a check on the aggressively expanding power of the Fed.

  • Trump is doing a great service for this nation, whether or not he wins the nomination. If the republican party does not catch on they are done, and good riddance.
    GO TRUMP!!!

  • Arizona Don

    Donald Trump without even trying has pointed out major flaws within our electoral system, that actually we all knew but ignored. If we look closely enough we can and will see how obvious it is. In some way we must eliminate donations in all presidential races after the nominee has been determined. “This must not be an option.” Pac’s must also be done away with at least after the primary. Just by being self funded it has become obvious. Of course those who realize money can mean a win even if not the best qualified such a change will also however have dissenters. Will the people?

    • marlene

      Sure, we all knew it, but it would be better if the President also acknowledged it. TRUMP 2016

    • Watchmanonwall

      So, only RICH people who can afford to self fund can run for office? Very elitist of you. That and VERY UNCONSTITUTIONAL. When I make a donation to a candidate, I am putting my money where my mouth is and speaking — Freedom of speech. Perhaps you heard of it in North Korea. Go back there.

      • Arizona Don

        Certainly not. It is already an option by law. It however, must not be an option but compulsory to take that government money! No corporations or Pac’s allowed to attempt to shade elections.

  • Cecilia Gast

    Sorry, guys and gals, I’m a Cruz person. But Trump is undeniably good for the country. So is Cruz. He has fought the establishment from the get go. McConnell and the other sellouts hate him., That’s good enough for me.

    • wearyconservative1946

      I’m a Cruz for President person too, but I’ll most assuredly give Trump my vote if he’s our nominee.

      • Henry L

        Same here.

    • CommonSense4America

      Carson, Cruz, Trump in that order but I will vote for any one of them in the general.

      • marlene

        No CommonSense! carson: “Al Sharpton and I have the same goals”, support forced “mandatory vaccinations for every one, regardless of any objections whatsoever”, has a violent temper. cruz: “Both Obama and I are ineligible for the Oval Office,” he’s associated with the CFR, refused to fund US Soldiers, supports anchor babies and citizenship for their parents, is a globalist, and even worse he’s a member of congress! TRUMP is the last man standing.

        • CommonSense4America

          I’m certainly glad that you have your opinions. Now, vote your conscience.

          • marlene

            My opinions come from my conscience and are formed by documented facts, not from wishful thinking or denial. Try it yourself!

          • CommonSense4America

            My thoughts come from investigating ALL of the facts of a story, not headlines from a biased source.

          • marlene

            Your comments don’t agree with your claim. Frankly, I don’t even care about where you come from. You’re not worth the time it takes to type any more responses. So have fun getting in the last word, but remember, we ALL will see you for what you really are – LOL!

          • paradoc2

            You two should get a room and work it out – anything but the Hildabeest yo…

          • marlene

            We did – it’s called the Library!

          • Walter Flatt

            IF YOU LOVE THIS COUNTRY, YOU WILL READ THIS ALL THE WAY THROUGH AND SEND IT TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW.

            30 I DO NOT KNOW HOW LONG I WILL BE ABLE TO SEND THIS OUT, OUR GOVERNMENT MAY DECIDE TO STOP ME.
            29 I SAY, CONTACT YOUR ELECTED OFFICIALS EVERY DAY AND LET THEM KNOW HOW YOU FEEL. ARE YOU FOR AMERICA?
            28 MILLIONS ARE TRAINED AND CAN TRAIN OTHER TO USE GUNS, VETS,TROOPS,COPS, HUNTERS WE DON’T NEED PERMITS WE THE SECOND ADMENDMENT AND NO LAW SURPRESS THAT.
            27 ANALYZE THESE QUESTIONS AND MAKE UP YOUR MIND ON WHAT WE NEED TO DO TO PROTECT OUR COUNTRY AND PREVENT A UNBELIVABLE BLOOD BATH IF ALL OF THE ANSWERS ABOVE IS YES.
            26 I COULD TAKE 100 ARMED MUSLIMS AND TAKE OVER ANY UNARMED MILITARY BASE, IF YOU WAS PREPAIRED TO KILL EVERY ONE ON THAT BASE AS MUSLIMS DO. IF SO, WHAT COULD YOU DO WITH 260 THOUSAND OR MORE.
            25 WHY ARE OUR TROOPS NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE GUNS AND AMMUNITION? COULD IT BE TO KEEP THEM FROM STOPPING AN INVASION?
            24 DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THE DEMOCRATS STARTED THE KKK. I KNOW THEY DID.
            23 WHY HAS BLACK AMERICA TURNED AGAINST THE PARTY THAT FREED THE SLAVES. LINCOLN WAS A REPUBLICAN, HE AND THOUSANDS OF WHITES DIED TO FREE THE SLAVES.
            22 DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THIS GOVERNMENT HAS FORCED ISRAEL TO NUKE IRAN? IF SO. I BELIEVE A NORTHEN ARMY WILL COME DOWN AND ATTACK ISRAEL AND GOD, NOT ISRAEL WILL DESTROY 3/4TH OF THAT ARMY IN THE VALLEY THERE.
            21 DO YOU BELIEVE OBAMA TO BE BLACK? HIS MOTHER WAS WHITE, HIS DAD A NORTH AFRICA ARAB.
            20 DID YOU BELIEVE OBAMA WHEN HE SAID ON NATION WIDE TV THAT HE WAS A MUSLIM? I BELIEVE THIS IS THE ONLY TRUTH HE HAS SAID.
            19 WHY DID OUR GOVERNMENT GIVE 5 TOP TERRIOST FOR ONE TRAITOR? WAS OBAMA PROTECTING HIS COMRADES?
            18 WAKE UP AMERICA, YOU HAVE NOT SEEN ANYTHING YET.
            17 WHY WAS A SHIPPMENT OF OVER 120 PLANES & OVER 100 TANKS TO EGYPT STOPPED AFTER THE ARMY KICKED THE RADICAL MUSLIMS OUT OF CONTROL LAST YEAR? WAS THE SHIPMENT TO HELP THE RADICALS?
            16 WHY IS OBAMA, KERRY AND HILLIARY. BRINGING IN 160 THOUSAND YOUNG MUSLIMS? COULD IT BE FOR AN IVASION?
            15 WOULD IT NOT BE BETTER IF EVERY PERSON HAD A GUN, WITH PLENTY OF AMMUNITION, IF WE WERE INVADED?
            14 WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF AN INVASION HAPPENS? WOULD THERE BE A NEW PRESIDENT? I DO NOT THINK SO.
            13 IS OBAMA BRINGING IN UN TROOPS TO POLICE OUR MAJOR CITIY’S? IF SO, COULD THIS BE PART OF A PLAN TO INVADE THIS COUNTRY? WHERE IS THIS AMMUNITION AT TODAY? AMMUNITION WITH OUR TAX MONEY AND ARE TRYING TO TAKE ALL GUNS, IS IT TO HELP AN INVADING ARMY?
            12 WHY DID OUR GOVERNMENT TRY AND BUY UP ALL OUR AMMO.
            11 ARE THERE 35 MUSLIM TRANING CAMPS HERE IN THE USA AND ONE 8 MILES OVER IN MEXICO? I VERIFIED ONE WAS OUTSITDE DOVER TENNESSEE, 1/13/16.
            10 TRUMP HAS A IQ IN EXCESS OF 156 AND IS THE MOST QUALIFIED PERSON TO RUN THIS COUNTRY HE IS NOT OBLIGATED, HE IS A 2 FISTED, IN YOUR FACE, TAKE NO CRAP FROM ANYONE, INCLUDING THE PRESS
            .9 WE HAD BETTER ARM EVER SOLDIER & VET. WE HAVE AND FORCE THEM TO CARRY THEM WITH PLENTY OF AMMUNITION. IF MENTALLLY QUALIFIED. THIS SHOULD BE DONE IMMEDIATELY. WE DO NOT NEED A PERMIT, WE HAVE THE 2 ADMENDMENT. NO JUDGE, GOVERNER OR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS HAS THE RIGHT TO SAY WE CANNOT. A LAW HAS TO BE PASSED.
            8 WHAT WILL YOU DO WHEN/IF WHOLESALE KILLING STARTS, HOLLER FOR OBAMA. YOU BETTER HAVE A GUN AND PLENTY OF AMMUNITION. IF ONE AMERICAN DIE FROM AN INVASION OF MUSLIMS, THE PEOPLE THAT LET THEM IN SHOULD BE ROUNDED UP AND PROSCUTED FOR ASSITING THE KILLERS.
            7 ALL SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVES HAD BETTER GET TOGETHER NOW AND BLOCK ALL MUSLIMS FROM ENTERING. CITZENS CONTACT YOUR GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES AND DEMAND THEY TAKE ACTION.
            6 QUESTIONS YOU SHOULD ASK YOURSELF, REGARDLESS IF YOU ARE REPUBLICAN, DEMOCRAT, OR INDEPENDENT. ARE THE THOUSANDS OF MUSLIMS OBAMA IS TRYING TO BRING INTO THIS COUNTRY A START OF AN INVASION OF HIS MUSLIM COMRADS?
            5 DONALD TRUMP HAS AN IQ OF 156+ AND THAT PUTS HIM ABOVE 99.9 IN THE WORLD. NOW WHO IS QUALIFED TOBE THE BEST PRESIDENT? I HAVE NEVER SEEN A PERSON RUNNING FOR ANY OFFICE PAYING THEIR OWN WAY. DONALD TRUMP IS THE FIRST. SO, HE IS NOT OBLIGATED TO ANYONE AND IS HIS OWN MAN.
            4 I AM A REGISTERED DEMOCRAT, 85 YRS OLD, A CHRISTIAN AND A VETERAN OF THE KOREAN WAR, 52/53, AFTER GATHERING ALL FACTS, I VOTE FOR THE MOST QUALIFIED PERSON, NOT A PARTY. PARTY’S HAS PRACTICALLY RUINED US. WHY TAKE OUR GUNS?
            3 WHERE DID ALL THE AMMO GO THAT THEY BOUGHT UP?

            1 KENTUCKY HAS A REPUBLICAN GOVERNER THIS YEAR MAYBE HE WILL TELL US WHAT IS GOING ON ABOUT THE FEMA CAMP IN EAST KY., WITH ARMED GUARDS, I CANNOT FIND OUT.I HAVE INFO THAT WE HAVE 35 MUSLIM CAMPS ESTABLISHED IN THE USA. I VERIFIED THAT THERE IS ONE JUST OUTSIDE DOVER TENNESSEE, CLOSE TO FORT CAMPBELL, KY.
            1 WHY ARE THERE A BIG FEMA CAMP IN EVERY STATE, SOME MORE. COULD IT BE TO HOLD MUSLIMS LISTED AS REFUGES? IS IT TO HOUSE RADICAL MUSLIMS? READ THIS AND MAKE UP YOU MIND WHAT YOU THINK IS GOING ON.
            HAVE WE BEEN SET UP FOR A MUSLIM INVASION BY OBAMA, HILLARY AND KERRY? HOW MANY MUSLIMS ARE IN HIS MANAGEMENT TEAM?QUESTIONS TO THINK ABOUT.PLEASE PRAY IT DOES NOT HAPPEN, I AM. IT IS SCARY.PLEASE THINK WHAT COULD HAPPEN IN THIS COUNTRY TOMORROW.

          • Walter Flatt

            MY CONSICIENCE IS DONALD TRUMP ALL THE WAY, NOT A PERSON KOW TOWING TO BIG MONEY PACS. A STAND UP, IN YOUR FACE, TAKE NO CRAP FROM ANYONE, INCLUDING THE PRESS. A MANS MAN.

        • Walter Flatt

          NOT ONLY THAT BUT SHARPTON SHOULD BE IN JAIL FOR INCOME TAX EVASION, YOU OR WOULD BE IS WE OWED ONE THOUSAND IF WE DID NOT PAY, OR THE FEDS WOULD TAKE EVERYTHING WE OWN. NOT SHARPTON. TRUMP ALL THE WAY.

          • marlene

            I agree.

    • Walter Flatt

      CECILIA, CRUZ IS NOT QUALIFIED TO RUN THIS COUNTRY, HE IS OBLIGATED TO BIG MONEY AND CANNOT BE HIS OWN MAN. TRUMP IS NOT OBLIGATED TO ANYONE.

  • marlene

    When this brain dead media hore from Fox says “they”, she means the elite 1% who pull her strings. I agree with Newt TRUMP is good for America and Americans.

    • dfinch

      Who in the world are you talking about?

  • ernst

    Newt nails it!

  • paradoc2

    He is bringing out the things on most American’s minds like it or not. The PC line towed by Romney did what?
    Whether he eventually gets the top spot or not, we should all thank him for airing out what matters rather than mealy-mouthing around the most important issues…

  • Trump for President! How can I volunteer to help the cause?

    • Watchmanonwall

      Send a self-addressed stamped envelope to yourself and instructions will be inside.

  • Walter Flatt

    TO HECK WITH PARTIES, TRUMP IS EXACTLY WHAT OUR COUNTRY NEEDS AT THIS TIME AND HE WILL BE ELECTED IS WE ARE NOT INVADED BY MUSLIMS, OR UNDER MARSHALL LAW, IF EITHER HAPPEN WE WILL HAVE A BLOOD BATH AND TRUMP WILL STILL BE OUR PRESIDENT.

  • m1a0n3u0e1l2

    Did Trump dug out the worst and despicable scum from the bottom of the American Septic tanks? Yes, he did. Now the “Americans” accept as normal: Touching women’s vaginas, insulting blacks, Latins, Women, Foreigners and even disabled people, incest, civil attacks and by authorities, lying, stealing, misrepresentations, obeying the laws that don’t suit your interests, etc. etc. Yes, this Orange lascivious incestuous and depraved satyr has become a national symbol and idol for our present and future generation. What a pitiful design has this country reached!

  • James

    Doesn’t matter how many ‘new’ voters the repubs get, if they don’t start standing with the Trumpster they will lose many who voted them into office. Too many lies and broken promises by repubs; which is why I no longer vote party lines, I vote according to past and present records, guided by conservative values!